BPM drives High Performance Organisations (HPO’s)

By , ITWeb contributor.

Johannesburg, 20 May 2013
International process improvement expert, Steve Towers, advocates an 'outside-in' approach.

International process improvement expert, Steve Towers, advocates an ‘outside-in’ approach.

How business process management (BPM) is applied in the organisation is what makes the difference between ordinary businesses and high-performance organisations (HPOs), says international process improvement expert, Steve Towers.

Towers, who is preparing to release his eighth book, says his research into the characteristics of HPOs has resulted in the book and a new set of tools aimed at maximising BPM to enhance business performance.
“In BPM, there is a lot of focus on Lean Six Sigma, the technologies and the processes. Basically, companies are doing things right, but they are not doing the right things,” says Towers.

Their metrics may tell them they are managing their processes correctly; they may be showing high levels of performance and efficiency in line with their traditional metrics, but despite this, they may still be going bankrupt. This is because they are measuring the wrong things,” he says.
“They may be very busy – but are they doing the right things in the 21st century context?”

Towers says the most critical measure is that of total customer experience. “Companies cannot focus internally,” he says. “HPOs focus on the customer experience. It’s not just about what happens internally; it is also about what happens before that process and what happens after.” Towers has long advocated an ‘outside-in’ approach, rather than an ‘inside-out’ one. This way of thinking is customer-centric, something organisations have to be in an increasingly competitive business environment.

To align processes with HPO best practice, says Towers, organisations need to ask ‘who are our customers and what are their needs?’
“Don’t start with the technology or the process,” he says. “By focusing on the customer first, you may discover you have been focusing too much on unprofitable customers, for example. Once the target customers are identified, you have to define what it is they need. This is often not articulated well – they may not know what they need before it exists, and often the focus is mistakenly placed on what customers think they want – not what they actually need. HPOs actually produce products and services in advance of customer needs.”

Towers highlights revolutionary technologies, such as the Apple iPod, which met customer needs at a time when customers themselves did not realise all-in-one digital music management was something they wanted and needed.
“HPOs use systematic approaches to this,” says Towers. “They are scientific about assessing customer needs, and measuring what customer success looks like. Classically, companies use subjective approaches like net promoter scores to assess customer satisfaction. But this is not necessarily good enough. This is a very subjective way to measure customer experience.”
Towers says: “Companies need to get scientific about customer experience – they need to measure the right things, using the customer experience ratios used by HPOs.”

ITWeb BPM Summit 2013

Now in its fifth year, ITWeb’s BPM Summit reveals how to drive breakthrough business performance by focusing on practical advice, technology updates and case studies. The summit will help BPM practitioners to improve their skills, advance their BPM projects, and deliver truly transformational BPM to their organisations. For more information, click here.

Towers notes that assessing customer experience by asking ‘how do you feel?’ is subjective and reactive – it takes place after the event. “HPOs know that evaluation of customer experience has to take place at the time of the action, delivering immediate feedback that allows enterprises to manage and control the interactions as they happen.”

This new approach to measuring customer experience to deliver business benefits could help fast-track organisations’ growth in SA, Towers believes. “In BRICS nations, companies are now setting new benchmarks on what performance looks like. They have the potential to take these concepts, run with them and become world-class performers. In line with this, South African companies stand to play in the big league if they adopt more effective process management,” he says.

Towers will deliver a keynote presentation at the upcoming ITWeb BPM Summit on market-focused approaches to strategic business improvement. He will also elaborate on these approaches in a workshop aligned with the event, when he will outline his findings on HPO differentiators. The tactics of HPOs, to be revealed in his soon-to-be-released book, will be shared with SA ahead of world audiences. Towers will also give insights into the metrics behind customer experience ratios – the new measure for customer experience.

For more information about this event, click here.

BPM, Balanced Scorecard, EA and High Performance (presentation)

At a recent performance appraisal this comment was made seriously,
“If you pay me for doing dumb things, I will get really smart at doing dumb things”.

Do you measure people with ‘dumb’ metrics – activities and outputs, or with Outside In measures of results and outcomes? If Balanced Scorecards (BSC) and Strategy Maps fail it is largely as a consequence of having dumb metrics in there – activities and outputs.

So how can we measure the right things and encourage success? Instead of people rushing to deal with a call (because all calls must be less than 2 minutes) how do we measure the meeting of a customer need – effective resolution of a query? Using the appropriate process and performance metrics within an articulated Enterprise Architecture is a good starting point. This presentation leads us to the how of that. Enjoy.

The Customer Experience is the Process – do you really believe that?

The Customer Experience is the Process. What does that really mean and how can that help us reduce costs, grow revenues and improve the customer delivery (at the same time). In this first short presentation James Dodkins (BP Groups Chief Customer Officer) provides us with an understanding.

Identity, Expression and reputation (thanks Mathias Klang)

Something for the weekend sir? This is a really good one on the rights and wrongs of freedom.
I really get with the slide featuring Stephen Fry 🙂

2. Breakpoints – the root of all internal evil and yet the Promised land?

That is the size of the prize the Break Points Toolkit targets – the rest of the non-value added work iceberg.
Non value-added work is consuming up to 90% of your employees’ time. Yet many of the approaches to increasing utilization are producing little benefit and may even be contributing to the problem. Yet there is a much easier and direct way to identify the causes of this non value-added work in your organization so that you can start eliminating them today!
A Google search on “non value added work” turns up over 104 million matches. It’s an issue we are all very aware of, one that is a source of continuing frustration because most often when we act to increase our utilization somehow the numbers never seem to hit the bottom line.
So what we are doing isn’t working.
We need something different, something that works. Perhaps there is a statistical method or scientific formula that will help us break through this success barrier?
Actually, all you need is a simple technique that allows you to identify the source of the non value-added work so that it can then be removed! 
It’s kind of like a tumor. Before X-Rays, Sonograms, and MRIs, it wasn’t easy to identify a tumor in the human body. With these tools many tumors are now very easy to identify. They stand out like a sore thumb.

For non-value added work our diagnostic machine is Break Points. They are the number one cause of work in organizations everywhere and yet most of the time we aren’t even aware that we should be looking for them.

Like those advanced medical diagnostic machines, using Break Points as our “cause of work diagnostic machine” makes it easy to identify the sources of non-value added work.

And once we have identified them we can take action to eliminate them. That’s where we are going next.

 

1. Breakpoints – those insidious internal handoffs

insidious – Proceeding in a gradual, subtle way, but with harmful effects:

Yup that is Breakpoints.


Most process improvement techniques focus on only a small portion of the improvement potential in every process… the tip of the iceberg if you will. 
How big is the opportunity resting out of our sight, hidden below the waterline of current process improvement practices? 
Recent research shows that as much as 70 to 90 percent of the work people do on a daily basis comes directly from Causes of Work and this work is NOT part of the “job” for which these people were hired! Instead, this is non-value added work that takes away from people’s ability to do their job.
Does this sound familiar? Can you identify places in your work or life where these Causes of Work are distracting you from what you really want to be doing?
Are you required to fill out this form, check up on that order, follow-up on those activities, fix the thing that is broken, find what got lost, or explain why this was done that way? 
Do you get tasked with finding the answer, knowing the rules, going to meetings (because), pushing something through, chasing down what really happened, explaining why you did this or that? The list goes on and on but you shouldn’t need to look very far in any part of your life to find all kinds of examples of non-value add work you are doing every single day!
The Break Points Toolkit explicitly targets these “hidden” wasters of time and money. Causes of Work are the “rest of the iceberg” for process improvement that, when addressed, lead to dramatic process improvement results regardless of what kind of process is involved or what kind of organization the process is in.
Can you envisage reducing the costs of your operations by 20%, 30%, 40% or even more than 50%?

5. Moments of Truth and their link to Strategy

The Five Steps to Winning the Triple Crown with MOT’s
Identify your Goal
Of course the overall goal is to improve customer satisfaction. But to achieve that goal we need to know what role we are acting within. This helps us know if we are educating, leading, directing or doing.
Describe your Target
The target is the “area” we are seeking to improve. Most often this would be thought of in terms of a “process” but there is no restriction on how we define the target areas we are working on.
Identify Moments of Truth
For the target area, all of the Moments of Truth that exist need to be identified. They also need to be described well enough that what was meant is easily recognizable to others or when we come back to our work at a later date.
“Blink” your Analysis
Judging the impact of Moments of Truth on Customer Satisfaction is a very subjective thing. It’s relatively easy for people to do, but very difficult to codify. It can best be done by looking at the Goal, the Target and the Moments of Truth all together. In most cases the Moments of Truth that are problematic will immediately become obvious.
Describe your Actions
Describing your actions is the way you build the direction, leadership vision or specific activities that need to be done for improvement to take place. Depending on what your Goal is, your Actions need to take the form that will help get the work you know needs doing, done.
It’s important to have a goal. If we don’t have a goal then it’s very hard to play the game to win! So in your MOT Plan you need a goal.
What is your goal?
While Improving Customer Satisfaction is the overall goal, the specific goals for people to help us achieve that are what is needed to get results.

Those specific goals could be several things depending on who you are and what you do. Let’s look at some examples and see how they change the nature of the MOT Plan goal.

4. Moments of Truth, metrics and dashboards

4. Moments of Truth, metrics and dashboards
Consider a dashboard of MOT’s across the organization. Ownership can be assigned to each and every MOT and they can be actively managed to progressively improve the process. For any process that deserves to exist there is an optimum number of MOT’s to achieve a Successful Customer Outcome (SCO).  What would be the theoretical optimum? One MOT. It is however rare to find that animal, so at a pragmatic level what should be the optimum?
A direct relationship exists between the technology that supports a process, the peoples skill and competence and the clear objective articulation of an SCO. Lower levels of organization maturity (technology, people, process) result in higher numbers of MOT’s. This in turn creates higher costs, poorer service and less than optimal performance.
On a scale of 1-10 (1 bad, 10 good) how developed and supportive is the technology, people skills and SCO development?

A typical dashboard with MOT’s includes metrics such as: Amount, Type, Ownership, Alignment, Trend, Ratio and Impact. We will explain and discuss the latter two later.

Voice of Customer (doh)

Business Process Management – what is it?
http://youtu.be/NO54KXxTp9I

Moments of Truth – what are they?
http://youtu.be/OT_2cqMtrUw

Breakpoints and Business Rules?
http://youtu.be/_8KSN_McWIg

Successful Customer Outcomes (SCO’s) http://youtu.be/u4keI_kmdxM 

Voice of Customer? http://youtu.be/bTbHrxi1Vq4  


Latest CPP program – Levels 1-8
http://www.bpgroup.org/certification-by-
city.html


Linked In (Over 10,000 members now)  BP Group overall 85,000
Certified Process Professionals 25,000+

3. Moments of Truth and alignment

3. Moments of Truth and alignment
Having identified the MOT’s and understood their Type we can ask ourselves do they explicitly contribute to the achievement of a Successful Customer Outcome. In a very direct way you can see MOT’s that are moments of misery, and those that are moments of magic.
Naturally we wish to eradicate the moments of misery, and optimize the moments of magic. Famously Scandinavian Airlines, under the leadership of Jan Carlson, set about removing unnecessary MOT’s and in doing so became one of Europes leading airlines in the late 1980’s.
How many MOT’s can you find, what type are they and do they contribute to a Successful Customer Outcome?